Inasmuch as the hearing officer's decision, finding that petitioner was entitled to succeed to the Housing Authority tenancy of his late mother, was contrary to law, respondent's determination overruling that decision was not "`arbitrary and capricious, affected by error of law or an abuse of discretion'" and, accordingly, may not be judicially disturbed (Matter of Kaphan v DeBuono,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.