Defendant's motion to dismiss three of the counts against him as barred by the statute of limitations (CPL 30.10 [2] [b]) was properly denied. The statute was tolled pursuant to CPL 30.10 (4) (a) (ii), because the record sufficiently establishes that defendant's identity and whereabouts were unknown and unascertainable by the exercise of reasonable diligence (see People v Seda,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
