The motion court dismissed plaintiff's breach of contract cause of action upon the ground that there was no privity of contract between defendant and plaintiff, the alleged assignee of the contract sued upon between defendant and plaintiff's alleged predecessor in interest. The court apparently concluded that the contract alleged was not assignable since it was one for personal services and was silent as to its assignability. However, although personal services contracts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
