Conflicting deposition testimony as to whether, as plaintiff claims, she was struck by defendants' vehicle while crossing the street, or whether, as defendants claim, the vehicle stopped before she came in contact with it, raises an issue of credibility inappropriate for resolution on a motion for summary judgment (see, Sanchez v Finke,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ELAMIN v. ROBERTS EXPRESS, INC.
290 A.D.2d 291 (2002)
735 N.Y.S.2d 549
SHADIA ELAMIN, Respondent, v. ROBERTS EXPRESS, INC., et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 15, 2002.
Decided January 15, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
