MAHLER v. U.S.

No. 3:98CV2014(JBA).

195 F.Supp.2d 379 (2002)

Russell W. MAHLER, Russell W. Mahler, II, and William Mahler, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 11, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Bloss, Jacobs, Grudberg, Belt & Dow, P.C., New Haven, CT, William Andrew Lichtenfels, Lichtenfels & Associates, Guilford, CT, for Petitioners.

David X. Sullivan, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Haven, CT, John V. Cardone, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.


RULING ON MOTION FOR CONTEMPT [DOC. # 47]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

The merits of this case, which began as a now-withdrawn petition to quash certain IRS administrative summonses and took several procedural turns on an enforcement counterclaim, are now effectively resolved. All that remains is a renewed motion by the United States to hold Petitioners ("the Mahlers") in civil contempt and assess costs against them. For the reasons set out below, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases