Since the record did not permit the motion court to conclude as a matter of law either that negligence by defendant Start proximately caused plaintiff's alleged injury or that defendant-appellant movant Bridge View was free of negligence in connection with plaintiff's harm, Bridge View's motion for summary judgment upon its claim for common-law indemnification from Start was properly denied (see, Correia v Professional Data Mgt.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ODOM v. BRIDGE VIEW II COMPANY
291 A.D.2d 280 (2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 287
WILLIAM ODOM et al., Respondents, v. BRIDGE VIEW II COMPANY, Appellant and START ELEVATORS INC., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 14, 2002.
Decided February 14, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.