The motion court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff leave to commence a new action. Plaintiff, in accordance with the procedural requirements of CPLR 3211 (e), requested leave to replead in the event that defendants' motion to dismiss was granted, and although plaintiff did not submit additional evidence in support of her request to replead, such evidence was not essential to the relief sought (see Rovello v Orofino Realty Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CERRA v. SCHER FABRICS, INC.
298 A.D.2d 272 (2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 483
EVETTE CERRA, Respondent, v. SCHER FABRICS, INC., et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 24, 2002.
Decided October 24, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.