The divergence of opinion expressed by the parties' experts precludes summary judgment. Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the facts that defendant's first expert did not examine plaintiff's medical records until August 1999, and that defendant's second expert did not examine plaintiff until April 2001, do not entitle plaintiff to summary judgment as to either of the corresponding time periods. Defendant's expert affidavits raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
