LOCKETT v. HILL

00C-14419; A115245.

51 P.3d 5 (2002)

182 Or.App. 377

Walter LOCKETT and Kristin Santose, Appellants, v. Gary HILL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 3, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. MacAfee, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was James J. MacAfee, P.C.

No appearance for respondent Gary Hill.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.


SCHUMAN, J.

Defendant's dogs killed plaintiffs' cat. The trial court found that defendant was negligent and awarded plaintiffs $1,000 in compensatory damages but denied plaintiffs' claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and loss of companionship. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that they should be compensated for emotional distress resulting from witnessing the death of their pet. We affirm.

Although defendant's answer denied all of the allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases