A photograph of defendant taken in connection with an unrelated arrest that had been sealed pursuant to CPL 160.50 was properly received in evidence. The photograph, which was redacted to conceal its origin from the jury, was relevant to an issue that arose during trial concerning defendant's appearance. Defendant's principal argument is that the photograph was inadmissible because it was retained in violation of CPL 160.50 (1) (a). However, People v Patterson (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. TORRES
291 A.D.2d 273 (2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 312
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS TORRES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 14, 2002.
Decided February 14, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
