Claimant's motion to vacate his underlying conviction, together with the transcript of the hearing in which the Supreme Court granted the motion, clearly establish that the vacatur was based on CPL 440.10 (1) (d) and/or (h), in that the police unlawfully seized cocaine from defendant's person. Since those paragraphs of CPL 440.10 (1) are not enumerated in Court of Claims Act § 8-b (3) (b) (ii), the Court of Claims properly dismissed the claim (see Forest v State of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.