Defendant's CPLR 3101 (d) response respecting the expert testimony it intended to offer at trial apprised plaintiff that defendant's experts would dispute and rebut plaintiff's theory that his injury was caused by the failure of defendant, through its on-call anesthesiologist, to properly monitor and regulate plaintiff's body fluid levels. This response, although not detailed, was adequate, under all of the circumstances presented, including plaintiff's access to the hospital...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
