The non-durational period of the appointment is justified by undisputed evidence that the mental disease underlying appellant's incapacity is severe, progressing rapidly, irreversible and degenerative. We are not persuaded otherwise by the court's finding "of some indications" of an ability to learn skills that could "compensate for some of the symptomatologies." However, as suggested by respondent, we modify so as to require respondent to serve her annual reports on MHLS...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
