HOWARD v. OREGON MUT. INS. CO.

No. 26858.

46 P.3d 510 (2002)

137 Idaho 214

Harold K. HOWARD and Zola Howard, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2002 Term.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon Law Offices, Chartered, Boise, for appellants. Bruce S. Bistline argued.

Brady Law, Chartered, Boise, for respondent. Michael G. Brady argued.


KIDWELL, Justice.

This is a dispute regarding the interpretation of uninsured/underinsured motorists provisions in an insurance policy issued by Oregon Mutual Insurance Company (Oregon Mutual) to Harold and Zola Howard (the Howards). The Howards brought an action against Oregon Mutual seeking a declaratory judgment and damages for breach of contract and bad faith. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Oregon Mutual, finding that the policy's uninsured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases