1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 295 A.D.2d
  5. 295 A.D.2d 257 (2002)
 

CILLO v. RESJEFAL CORP.

295 A.D.2d 257 (2002)

743 N.Y.S.2d 860

DANIEL S. CILLO et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. RESJEFAL CORP. et al., Defendants, and IOWA BEEF PROCESSING, INC., Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 25, 2002.

Defendant's motion to strike plaintiffs' amended errata sheets or for further depositions was properly denied since a witness may make substantive changes to his or her deposition testimony provided the changes are accompanied by a statement of the reasons therefor (CPLR 3116 [a]; see, Skeaney v Silver Beach Realty Corp., 10 A.D.2d 537). Plaintiffs' amended errata sheets are accompanied by such a statement. The changes raise issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases