Plaintiff's assertion that the slippery condition of the floor was created by excessive or improper waxing is based on nothing more than her observation that the floor was "shiny." Since neither smoothness nor slipperiness, without more, permits an inference of negligent waxing or polishing, the action was properly dismissed (see Murphy v Conner,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CARAN v. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION
299 A.D.2d 252 (2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 60
EVANGELIA CARAN, Appellant, v. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 21, 2002.
Decided November 21, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.