Petitioner's argument that substantial evidence is lacking to support the hearing officer's finding that petitioner possessed heroin because the NIK drug test results relied upon by the hearing officer were received without a proper foundation is unavailing. Petitioner makes no claim that he timely objected to the admission of the NIK test results at the disciplinary hearing. We note, in any case, that NIK test results have been recognized by courts as facially competent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.