Since defendant's only objection to the prosecutor's summation was addressed to a different comment than those challenged on appeal, defendant's current challenges to the summation and his related arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the prosecutor's references to the undercover officer's training were fair comment on evidence in the record (see, People v Overlee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. RIVERA
292 A.D.2d 249 (2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 842
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AWILDA RIVERA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 19, 2002.
Decided March 19, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
