1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 226 F.Supp.2d
  5. 226 F.Supp.2d 314 (2002)
 

PIECZENIK v. DYAX CORP.

No. CIV.A. 00-11370-RGS.

226 F.Supp.2d 314 (2002)

George PIECZENIK and I.C. Technologies America, Inc. v. DYAX CORP.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

September 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Nicodema, Morgan & Finnegan, New York, NY, Thomas J. Gallitano, Michael T. Sullivan, Conn, Kavanaugh, Rosenthal, Peisch & Ford, Boston, MA, Neil V. McKittrick, Hill & Barlow, A Professional Corp., Boston, MA, Barry Schindler, Dreier & Baritz LLP, New York, NY, for George Pieczenik, Plaintiff.

James F. Haley, Christopher J. Harnett, Robert B. Wilson, Lynnette Noblitt, Fish & Neave, New York, NY, Hallie Kostrinsky, Fish & Neave, New York, NY, Christine M. Roach, Roach & Carpenter, P.C., Boston, for Dyax Corporation, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STEARNS, District Judge.

This decision follows a hearing held under the directives of Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996). "Markman requires a trial judge in a patent case to construe and define the contested claims of a patent. The task committed to the judge is to explain what...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases