1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 58 P.3d
  5. 58 P.3d 481 (2002)
 

BALL v. BIRCH, HORTON, BITTNER AND CHEROT

No. S-10015.

58 P.3d 481 (2002)

Gerald BALL, Albert Newton Ball, and Albert Ball, Jr., Appellants, v. BIRCH, HORTON, BITTNER AND CHEROT, a professional corporation, and Hal R. Horton, individually, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Rehearing Denied December 10, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Eldridge Hicks, Hicks, Boyd, Chandler & Falconer, Anchorage, for Appellants.

Patrick B. Gilmore, Atkinson, Conway & Gagnon, Anchorage, for Appellees.

Before: FABE, Chief Justice, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A law firm's clients sued the firm. They claimed, among other things, that the firm was negligent in negotiating a commercial transaction and preparing transactional documents. The law firm moved for complete summary judgment; it submitted in support an expert's report that addressed only the document-preparation claim. When the plaintiffs repeatedly failed to produce expert opinions to oppose the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases