STATE EX REL. FORMAN v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY

CCV98-03-550; A111100.

45 P.3d 491 (2002)

181 Or. App. 172

STATE ex rel. Leroy T. FORMAN, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent-Cross-Respondent, and Lloyd Marbet, Intervenor-Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent Leroy T. Forman. With him on the briefs were Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, P.C., Gary G. Linkous and Gary G. Linkous, P.C.

No appearance for respondent-cross-respondent Clackamas County.

Peggy Hennessy, Portland, argued the cause for intervenor-respondent-cross-appellant. With her on the briefs was Reeves, Kahn & Eder.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


HASELTON, P.J.

This appeal, supplemental appeal, and cross-appeal arise from a mandamus proceeding pursuant to former ORS 215.428.1 Plaintiff-relator Leroy Forman sought a writ compelling Clackamas County to issue a conditional land use permit authorizing operation of a gravel mining pit in a residential farm/forest zone. Intervenor Lloyd Marbet, a neighbor, contested the issuance of the writ. The trial court purported to allow...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases