1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 290 A.D.2d
  5. 290 A.D.2d 239 (2002)
 

ROSENBERG DIAMOND DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. APPEL

290 A.D.2d 239 (2002)

735 N.Y.S.2d 528

ROSENBERG DIAMOND DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al., Respondents, v. HEATHER APPEL et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 8, 2002.

Prior restraints on speech are strongly disfavored (see, Ramos v Madison Sq. Garden Corp., 257 A.D.2d 492). Free speech is protected from censorship "unless shown likely to produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest" (Terminiello v City of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1, 4, reh denied, 337 U.S. 934; accord,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases