Read as a whole, the court's charge on accessorial liability, which included the definition set forth in Penal Law § 20.00, conveyed the appropriate standard. In context, the court's emphasis on the phrase "intentional participation" could not have distracted the jury from the statutory definition (see, People v Johnson,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.