An issue of fact exists as to whether the requirement under the 1981 agreement that the three shareholder signatories receive equal compensation was superseded by the 1992 agreement, which did not contain an equal compensation requirement. Accordingly, we modify to reinstate that part of defendants' first counterclaim as seeks to recover the same compensation as was paid the other two shareholders up until the time that the equal compensation provision was admittedly superseded...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
