The court properly denied appellant's untimely request for a suppression hearing since the requisite showing of good cause was not made (see, Family Ct Act §§ 330.2, 332.2 [3]).
Any deficiencies in the chain of custody of the narcotics went to the weight, not the admissibility of the evidence, since the detective's testimony combined with that of the chemist provided adequate assurances of the identity and the substantially unchanged condition of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.