Since the deposition testimony of plaintiff and two nonparty witnesses raises issues of fact as to whether either or both of defendants-respondents created the condition that allegedly caused plaintiff to slip and fall, i.e., a patch of ice and grease on the sidewalk outside the restaurant, defendants' motions for summary judgment were improperly granted (see, Ramos v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
VAZQUEZ v. SANTANA
291 A.D.2d 230 (2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 90
JOSE VAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. MARGARITA SANTANA, Doing Business as MARGOT RESTAURANT, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 7, 2002.
Decided February 7, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.