In the Matter of PETER M. RIVERA et al., Appellants,
v.
PEDRO ESPADA, JR., Respondent, et al., Respondents, and THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Intervenors-Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued August 28, 2002.
Decided August 30, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Stanley Kalmon Schlein, Bronx, for appellants.
Lewis & Fiore, New York City (David L. Lewis of counsel), for Pedro Espada, Jr., respondent.
John Ciampoli, Albany, and Leahey & Johnson, P.C., New York City (Peter James Johnson, Peter James Johnson, Jr., and James P. Tenney of counsel), for intervenors-respondents.
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY and GRAFFEO concur in per curiam opinion; Judge ROSENBLATT taking no part.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
This appeal concerns the interpretation of Election Law § 16-110 (2),* allowing cancellation of the enrollment of a member of a political party after a finding that the party enrollee is not in sympathy with party principles. Because we conclude that the political party's determination was based both on evidence subject to immunity conferred by the Speech or Debate Clause of the New York...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.