No basis exists for disturbing respondent's finding that the questions put by petitioner to the claimant in an unemployment insurance hearing, ostensibly to probe the credibility of her claim that she had been sexually harassed in her employment and therefore had good cause for leaving it, went far beyond the range of relevancy to petitioner's fact-finding duties. Such duties did not include "a sexual harassment inquiry of the type one would find before EEOC or DHR," and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
