1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 56 P.3d
  5. 56 P.3d 463 (2002)
 

IN THE MATTER OF MADDOCKS

MC 020001; A117221

56 P.3d 463 (2002)

184 Or.App. 390

In the Matter of Mark H. Maddocks, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Mark H. MADDOCKS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 16, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kent A. Anderson, Eugene, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and David F. Coursen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a judgment continuing his commitment to the Mental Health Division. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that appellant currently meets the criteria for "mentally ill" set forth in ORS 426.005. We agree and therefore accept the state's concession.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases