BECHTEL PETROLEUM v. CONTINENTAL INS. CO.

No. B140133.

117 Cal.Rptr.2d 399 (2002)

BECHTEL PETROLEUM OPERATIONS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al. Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

As Modified March 28, 2002.

Review Granted May 15, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schaffer, Lax, McNaughton & Chen and John H. Horwitz, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sehr Cortner McNaboe Colliau & Jordan, San Francisco, and W. Heather Sourial, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Continental Insurance Company.

Sinnott, Dito, Moura & Puebla and Randolph P. Sinnott, Los Angeles; Wiley Rein & Fielding and Theodore A. Howard, Santa Ana, for Defendant and Respondent Steadfast Insurance Company.

Morris, Polich & Purdy, Jeffrey S. Barron, David Vendler, and Lee I. Petersil, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Royal Insurance Company of America.


BOLAND, J.*

SUMMARY

This is an appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to several insurers. The court concluded the insurers had no duty to defend an insured, Bechtel Petroleum Operations, Inc., against lawsuits brought by employees of Bechtel's subcontractors. The lawsuits sought damages for injuries caused by years of exposure to toxic substances at a work site...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases