The record supports the motion court's determination that grounds for the appointment of a receiver in this action for dissolution of a closely held corporation were not established, since Merola, one of the two principals owning 50% of the corporation, did not demonstrate danger of irreparable loss, and resort to a receivership is appropriate only when necessary for the protection of the interests of the parties (see, Matter of DiBona [General Rayfin],
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF HARRISON REALTY CORP.
295 A.D.2d 220 (2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 23
In the Matter of the Judicial Dissolution of HARRISON REALTY CORP. VINCENT A. MEROLA, Appellant; THOMAS J. AXON, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 18, 2002.
Decided June 18, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.