1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 290 A.D.2d
  5. 290 A.D.2d 225 (2002)
 

PEOPLE v. AUSTIN

290 A.D.2d 225 (2002)

735 N.Y.S.2d 750

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PHILLIP AUSTIN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 3, 2002.

The court properly denied defendant's application made pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 U.S. 79) since defendant failed to establish that the prosecutor's proffered explanations for challenging the panelists at issue were pretextual. The court's acceptance of the prosecutor's employment-based reasons for challenging these panelists is entitled to great deference (see, People v Wint, 237 A.D.2d 195

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases