1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 47 P.3d
  5. 47 P.3d 4 (2002)
 

LANE UNIFIED BARGAINING COUNCIL/SLEA/OEA/NEA v. SOUTH LANE SCHOOL DISTRICT 45J3

(UP-36-98; CA A106346; SC S48075).

47 P.3d 4 (2002)

334 Or. 157

LANE UNIFIED BARGAINING COUNCIL/SLEA/OEA/NEA, Petitioner on Review, v. SOUTH LANE SCHOOL DISTRICT 45J3, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided May 16, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Bishop, of Bennett, Hartman & Reynolds, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs was Mark Johnson.

Nancy Hungerford, of The Hungerford Law Firm, West Linn, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. With her on the brief was Brian Hungerford.

LEESON, J.

Petitioner Lane Unified Bargaining Council/SLEA/OEA/NEA (Association) sought judicial review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB). ERB dismissed the Association's claims that respondent South Lane School District (District) committed an unfair labor practice in violation of ORS 243.672(1)(g) and (h)1 by refusing to arbitrate a grievance that the Association had filed on behalf of Marc Rogge, a teacher and

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases