Although defendant's motion purported to be based in part on the constitutional right to a speedy trial, it consisted exclusively of a claim under CPL 30.30, a ground waived by his guilty plea, and it thus gave the court no opportunity to weigh the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HAZEL
298 A.D.2d 216 (2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 250
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHAUNCEY HAZEL, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 15, 2002.
Decided October 15, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.