No basis exists for departing from the general rule that a secondary subcontractor (plaintiff) who is not paid by its primary subcontractor (defendant Frame) cannot look for payment to the contractor with whom the primary subcontractor contracted (defendant-respondent Flour City), absent privity of contract (see Tibbetts Contr. Corp. v O & E Contr. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SKY-LIFT CORPORATION v. FLOUR CITY ARCHITECTURAL METALS, INC.
298 A.D.2d 214 (2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 725
SKY-LIFT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FLOUR CITY ARCHITECTURAL METALS, INC., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 15, 2002.
Decided October 15, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.