Since the defense had argued that the police had conspired to frame defendant, but had not included the District Attorney's office in those allegations, it was improper for the prosecutor to argue in summation that in order to convict defendant the jury would have to believe this prosecution constituted a conspiracy involving the District Attorney's office (see, People v Carter,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HEMMINS
290 A.D.2d 219 (2002)
735 N.Y.S.2d 751
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OTIS HEMMINS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 3, 2002.
Decided January 3, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
