1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 300 A.D.2d
  5. 300 A.D.2d 208 (2002)
 

SEINFELD v. ROBINSON, III

300 A.D.2d 208 (2002)

755 N.Y.S.2d 69

FRANK D. SEINFELD et al., Appellants, v. JAMES D. ROBINSON, III, et al., Defendants. WILLIAM C. RAND, as Objector, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 31, 2002.

In light of our finding that the nominal defendant corporation benefitted from plaintiffs' litigation (see Seinfeld v Robinson, 246 A.D.2d 291), the motion court properly declined to make no award or only a nominal award of attorneys' fees to plaintiffs' counsel. Contrary to the arguments on the main appeal, the motion court properly exercised its broad power to accept or reject the report of the Judicial Hearing Officer (see...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases