Defendant's challenge to his assault conviction is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that it was based on legally sufficient evidence. Furthermore, we find that it was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury could have reasonably concluded from the circumstances of the assault that defendant's act of banging the victim's head against the
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
