The motion court properly dismissed plaintiffs' first cause of action for negligent misrepresentation, since the allegedly wrongful representation of defendant accounting firm to plaintiffs, its clients, i.e., that if plaintiffs put additional funds into their company, Whirlaway, factors would continue to extend Whirlaway credit, amounts to no more than a nonactionable "expression of future expectation" (Bower v Atlis Sys.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEARLMAN v. FRIEDMAN ALPREN & GREEN LLP
300 A.D.2d 203 (2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 869
JAMES PEARLMAN et al., Appellants, v. FRIEDMAN ALPREN & GREEN LLP, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 24, 2002.
Decided December 24, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
