Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Probable cause was established by the fact that the arresting officer had seen a videotape of the crime several times and subsequently encountered defendant, whom he recognized as the person shown on the tape. Contrary to defendant's argument, in the circumstances presented herein, the People were not required to produce the videotape at the suppression hearing in order to meet their burden of coming forward to show the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
