COUCH v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK


296 A.D.2d 194 (2002)

746 N.Y.S.2d 187

MADELINE COUCH, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 12, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Cherofsky, Nyack, for appellant.

Geisler & Gabriele, LLP, Garden City (Jeffrey P. DeGeorges of counsel), for County of Suffolk, respondent.

Farley, Holohan, Glockner & Toto, LLP, Mineola (John F. Toto and Elizabeth Weiss of counsel), for Brunswick Hospital Center, respondent.

FLORIO, FEUERSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

RITTER, J.P.

In a medical malpractice action, we are asked to determine, inter alia, whether the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the continuous treatment doctrine may be invoked against the defendant County of Suffolk (hereinafter the County), which owns and operates the Tri-County Community Health Center (hereinafter Tri-County). We hold that a triable issue of fact has been raised by the plaintiff's allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases