MATTER OF SHENKMAN


291 A.D.2d 194 (2002)

740 N.Y.S.2d 132

In the Matter of JERROLD SHENKMAN, an Attorney, Respondent. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Petitioner.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 8, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary L. Casella, White Plains (Matthew Renert of counsel), for petitioner.

Rand Rosenzweig Smith Radley Gordon & Burstein, LLP, New York City (Robert A. Burstein of counsel), for respondent. pline as the Court deems just and proper. The respondent has submitted an affidavit in response in which he does not contest the charge but asks that the Court determine the appropriate discipline to be a private censure.

Charge One alleges that the respondent has been convicted of a serious crime within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d) and 22 NYCRR 691.7 (b).

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SANTUCCI, ALTMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The petitioner served the respondent with a petition dated January 18, 2001, containing one charge of professional misconduct. After a hearing on March 21, 2001, at which the petitioner introduced three exhibits and the respondent called one witness and offered two exhibits in evidence, the Special Referee sustained the charge. The petitioner now moves to confirm the Special...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases