1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 226 F.Supp.2d
  5. 226 F.Supp.2d 255 (2002)
 

LUCERNE FARMS v. BALING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 02-CV-49-B-S.

226 F.Supp.2d 255 (2002)

LUCERNE FARMS, Plaintiff v. BALING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant

United States District Court, D. Maine.

October 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. Brann, Kevin J. Beal, Esq., Daniel Nuzzi, Esq., Brann & Isaacson, Lewiston, ME, for Lucerne Farms, plaintiff.

Frederick J. Badger, Jr., Richardson, Whitman, Large & Badger, Bangor, ME, Peter K. Skivington, Esq., Jones and Skivington, Geneseo, NY, for Baling Technologies Inc, defendant.

ORDER

SINGAL, District Judge.

A producer of animal feed seeks contract and tort damages from the seller of a reconditioned baling machine that the buyer claims was defective. Presently before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Docket # 16). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

When a district court rules on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases