Since defendant did not, at any time during the Sandoval proceedings, give any indication that he wished to preclude inquiry as to his parole status, his present claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant's sentence and parole for a felony conviction, the nature of which was precluded, was relevant to credibility (see, People v Walker,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.