Defendant's various challenges to the admission of expert testimony concerning the roles of participants in street-level narcotics operations are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that there was sufficient indication that defendant may have acted with one or more accomplices to justify the introduction of such testimony, and that the testimony was proper in all respects (see, People v Brown...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
