1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 298 A.D.2d
  5. 298 A.D.2d 168 (2002)
 

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK v. AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P.

298 A.D.2d 168 (2002)

748 N.Y.S.2d 360

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Respondent, v. AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, L.L.P., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 8, 2002.

Although in a prior diversity action, the Western District of Texas, adopting the recommendations of a Magistrate Judge, determined that Texas law governed, and required the dismissal of two contribution claims asserted against parties other than Akins Gump, plaintiff herein, the Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase), is not collaterally estopped from asserting contribution claims barred under Texas law against Akins Gump, since a choice-of-law analysis specific to Chase and Akin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases