The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification. The jury properly credited the undercover officer's testimony that defendant personally supplied drugs in exchange for money, and properly discredited defendant's testimony that he did nothing more than seek out a possible drug supplier for a fellow addict.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.