The court properly allowed limited cross-examination of defendant regarding his possession of two beepers since this evidence was relevant to an issue raised during his testimony and was not unduly prejudicial (see People v Carpenter,
Defendant's application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.