The affidavit of defendant Rajendra Parikh, offered as an expert opinion, failed to establish defendants-appellants' prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, since it contained only conclusory, self-serving assertions, lacking any reference to specific industry standards and/or practices, to support the conclusion that the work at issue was done in a professionally competent manner (see Estate of Nevelson v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
R.A.B. CONTRACTORS, INC. v. STILLMAN
299 A.D.2d 165 (2002)
753 N.Y.S.2d 362
R.A.B. CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. IRWIN STILLMAN et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) 1515 SUMMER STREET CORP. et al., Respondents, v. RAJENDRA PARIKH et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 7, 2002.
Decided November 7, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
