1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 84 S.W.3d
  5. 84 S.W.3d 378 (2002)
 

SUPRISE v. DEKOCK

No. 13-00-640-CV.

84 S.W.3d 378 (2002)

Ron SUPRISE and Maria Estela Suprise, Appellants, v. Jim DEKOCK, Jr. and Pat Edwards, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

August 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter J. Passmore, Passmore, Walker & Twenhafel, Thomas O. Matlock, Jr., McAllen, for Appellants.

Sheryl Gray Rasmus, The Rasmus Firm, Austin, for Appellees.

Before Justices DORSEY, YAÑEZ, and CHAVEZ.

OPINION

Opinion by Justice DORSEY.

This summary judgment case involves a suit by Ron and Maria Suprise for damages resulting from an alleged tortious interference with the use and enjoyment of their land by appellees, Jim DeKock, Jr., and Pat Edwards. Appellees obtained a summary judgment denying recovery because tortious interference with the use and enjoyment of land is not a recognized cause of action in Texas. The issue is whether a cause of action exists...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases